Seongbin Sim vs Danil Panarin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jul at 03:43 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Sim vs D. Panarin

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sim 1 - 0 Panarin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Seongbin Sim winning 2 and Danil Panarin winning 0. The last match between Seongbin Sim and Danil Panarin was at the M15 Maanshan, 09-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Seongbin Sim getting the victory 6-3 3-1 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sim | 1 |
| Panarin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Maanshan(07-09-25)
S. Sim vs D. Panarin H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.58% (95-70) | Career Total W/L | 47.22% (17-19) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Sim vs D. Panarin Match Preview:
- Sim's second serve success rate stands at 44.72%, while Panarin edges slightly ahead with 45.45%. Can this minor difference impact the match outcome? Not significantly on its own.
- In terms of winning points on an opponent's second serve, Sim leads significantly with 48.84% compared to Panarin’s 42%.
- For first serve returns, Sim also has a slight advantage with 26.11% over Panarin’s 24.66%.
- Analyzing performance under pressure, Sim has a breakpoint save percentage of 58.23%, outperforming Panarin’s 53.33%.
- Sim has a higher match win percentage over the past year at 62.9%, compared to Panarin’s 56.25%, signaling better overall form.
- Both players demonstrate peak performance on Indoor hard courts, with Sim winning 78% and Panarin 71% of matches, showcasing similar proficiency.
- Sim competes more frequently with a higher success rate (63.79%) in the $10K level tournaments compared to Panarin (56.25%).
- Despite playing opponents with a marginally higher average rank, Panarin has maintained comparable performance to Sim.
- Sim is more successful in deciding sets, securing 39% compared to Panarin’s 20%, indicating resilience under pressure.
- Remarkably, Panarin excels in breakpoint conversions, scoring 75%, while Sim lags behind with 32.63%.
Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):
As the match approaches, Sim shows a strong game in both returning serves and saving breakpoints, leading to a higher overall win percentage.
While Panarin demonstrates proficiency in converting breakpoints, Sim’s ability to handle decisive set pressure could be pivotal.
The similarly favorable Indoor hard court records suggest an even playing field in terms of surface comfort.
Considering Sim's consistent performance and resilience, especially in high-pressure situations, they are projected to have the upper hand in this encounter.
Based on these factual comparisons, Sim is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Seongbin Sim vs Danil Panarin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Sim vs D. Panarin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 9 | Games Won | 4 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:1:48 | Average Match Time | 1:1:48 |
| 71% (22/31) | 1st Serve % | 40% (19/47) |
| 86% (19/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12/19) |
| 67% (6/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (21/47) | Return Points Win % | 19% (6/31) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Sim Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | ||
D. Panarin Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 3-1 ret. | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 4-0 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||

S. Sim vs D. Panarin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.58% (95/70) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.22% (17/19) |
| 57.37% (214/159) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.00% (41/41) |
| 52.36% (1864/1696) | Games Win/Loss | 51.30% (394/374) |
| 55.08% (65/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (4/8) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 71.43% (20/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (10/5) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 324 | Aces Total | 73 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 267 | Total Double Faults | 87 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:27:44 |
| 248.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 427.97 |
| 60% (3137/5232) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1055/1800) |
| 67% (2090/3137) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (723/1055) |
| 49% (1025/2095) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (382/745) |
| 42% (224/530) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (82/188) |
| 40% (2069/5161) | Return Points Win % | 40% (787/1946) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.76% (93/68) | Futures W/L | 47.22% (17/19) |
| 58% (94/162) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (16/35) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (23/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (4/12) |
| 45% (20/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 27% (3/11) |
| 90% (96/86) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 70% (20/14) |
| 10% (96/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 30% (20/6) |
| 13% (69/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (16/3) |